Monday, November 30, 2009

Benjamin Elliff's Testimony

I was the typical product of the good Christian home early on. I could say spiritual things, memorize Scripture, and be excited and serious about the things that were done and taught.

After my family moved to Kansas City, the urgency of eternal things began to sink in as I listened to the pastors at my home church and heard my father's messages about false faith and false assurance delivered in other churches and in conferences. I took it all seriously and prayed often to God to save me or to give me assurance if He had. I continued to pray this kind of prayer (and very little else) because it seemed that one day it would take hold. During several short periods I felt confident in my salvation, but generally I was unsure, and at no time was I prepared to speak openly about it. On the whole I was content to wait until the fruit of a changed life could be clearly distinguished from my childish desire to please and be accepted.

Early in my teen years I began to notice that not everyone believed what my father believed and what I had always taken for granted about God and the Bible. In fact, it became evident that most of the world thought his position foolishness and were prepared to offer what looked to me like plausible arguments. Well, it wasn't foolishness—of that I was convinced, at least in the beginning—and I didn't want it to be foolishness. I would just have to find the reasonable basis for the whole system, for all the things that seemed obvious to me, like the existence of God and the infallibility and authority of the Bible.

To my surprise, after a careful (and what I thought was impartial) examination I found nothing underneath all of this that could withstand my increasing capacity to doubt. (Not that there was no evidence, but my godless mindset would not allow for evidence to be evidence.) Slowly, apprehensively, I sought for the things I really did know so that I could prove the whole Christian package, and realized stage by stage that I knew almost nothing for certain. Thinking became almost dangerous to me, and I slowed it down as much as possible; this whole descent into uncertainty was too unbelievable to be true, but it seemed inevitable.

The trend was alarming, but I dug in intellectually. "I will never give up reason," I thought. "It's too much a part of me, too necessary. The moment I give that up, then I will be truly lost." This resolve didn't keep me from giving up a million other things, like (in the end) confidence in the trustworthiness of my senses and certainty that the world was basically as it seemed. I was desperate to regain the ground I was losing, desperate to think through absolutely everything in order to build up the old edifice of purpose and clarity. Thought, and a lot of it, might get me or someone smarter than me there eventually (I thought), but if it did not, at least it seemed vaguely noble to die trying. If the Christians I talked to could not provide the kinds of arguments and answers I wanted, I would just have to find a better basis than they had ever dreamed of. This was an exciting resolve at first, but it became more and more oppressive as I did nothing but lose ground.

In all of this intellectual sin and foolishness, I did not want Christianity to be false, nor did I feel (on most days) that it would prove to be so. For this reason I lived in many respects as if it were true, and tried not to drag others into my position before I was successful according to my standards. I listened all the more intently to preaching and teaching, hoping to find the answers I wanted, but also (I'm afraid) judging the messages for what seemed like inconsistencies and weak reasoning. I was able to resolve some of these and unable to resolve others, and in my supposed neutral frame of mind I felt compelled to be disturbed about Christianity from this angle also.

An intensive course dealing with the history of Western thought as seen through Francis Schaeffer's eyes was the focus of my education as a sophomore and junior, and gave me an opportunity to think even more deeply about these issues. According to the course prescription and my family's custom, I applied a biblical standard to every question raised, though I was personally (of course) as unsettled as ever in my view of the Bible.

As we moved through history I began to see a remarkable thing: this road of autonomous thinking had been traveled before. The entire sad progression was there, from the original confidence that Christian tenets could be proven by man working from himself, to the lesser confidence that at least something of grand significance could be discovered by unaided reason and observation, to the struggle to find anything at all that is certain. And then I saw the end of all this pictured in Western history: Even reason had to go—I had no right to hold on to even that.

For the first time in my 5-year search my zeal for this pursuit of truth began to wane. Without the certainty of reason's reliability everything, really everything, became a dead end or an absurd bog. My mind was not equal to that. I could speak, but only in worthless irony or on the basis of what was commonly accepted. Every thought must be questioned as a matter of course and nothing must come to its rescue. It stifled all of my thinking and left me with nothing but suspended judgment. I acted on probability without believing in probability. In public, I could use the old forms of reason I had practiced all my life and use the premises others would accept, but in private, what was the use?

I finished the course with a heavy heart, seeing, but not yet willing (or even perhaps able) to commit myself to the solution presented, not even willing to face the choice. It meant giving up, in a sense, free thinking—all of that intellectual independence which I felt was so important and which I cherished; and so I busied myself with other matters for a long period.

Then I began to read the gospels because I couldn't leave the issue alone. I read them over and over again and was amazed at their genuineness and at the power and authority of Christ. I almost lived two lives during this period: one following Christ and another loyal to my independence in thought that had led me into so much deep and habitual doubt leading to despair.

It was at this time that my father took me aside and showed me clearly what I already knew: that my pattern of thinking over the past years had been a form of intellectual rebellion against God—instead of working in subjection to God's revelation, I had set myself up as an independent entity to judge its truth. I had undertaken a task that was impossible for a finite and fallen human mind. I should instead believe the truth of God. Only then could I be free to reason and know for certain. That was the day I stopped trying to arrive at the answers on my own and believed God unconditionally as the first step in my thinking.

The difference was night and day. Apologetic arguments that seemed previously shaky or untenable became perfectly reasonable. No longer did I have to know everything in order to know some things. Apparent contradictions in Scripture no longer shook my faith: God is true, and the fault lies with me. I enjoyed the confidence of knowing and saying simple things—things like, "There is a chair. I don't have to doubt it. I was created with senses to tell me these things, and two of the best ones tell me that this is a chair."

My belief was in God's revelation in Christ and Scripture. I recognized Christ as the Son of God and His words as absolute truth. I enjoyed exploring this new kind of freedom, but it also brought back the old questions about assurance. With my father's help, I came to the realization that the change in me was profound and that, in fact, I am one of those who believe in Christ—in His name and deity, in His word, and in His power to save. I do trust Christ when He says that I will never see death. And I do know Him because of the revelation of His word to me.

The immense joy I have in reading the Word of God, not as merely something interesting but as truth gives me continued assurance that God has done a work in me. I see in my life a desire to follow and obey Christ in every sphere.

[Benjamin was baptized in the hot tub of one of our church members on the night he gave this testimony, May 1st, 2005. This testimony can be found online at our evangelistic site, www.WaytoGod.org under "confessions." Benjamin is now attending Southern Seminary in Louisville, KY, where he is preparing to teach the Bible in an academic context.]


Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Stuffed: A Thanksgiving Tradition

by Jim Elliff

There he lay on the floor, swollen in the belly like a boa constrictor after swallowing a calf. It was Thanksgiving Day and my nephew did it again. Sometime between noon and 2 o'clock, the stuffing changed turkeys!

Every year the same thing happens to all of us—it's tradition. Is that OK? Not if we do it every day of the year. But on Thanksgiving? Go for it! Have no guilt. God taught us to feast on occasion. And don't feel badly about watching football games after you eat. You're no good for much else for awhile. However, in all you do thank God with all your heart.

First, realize that eating a big meal on this special day is, in a way, an expression of thanks to God. Thanksgiving Day was our forefathers' way of celebrating the abundance God gave them after those first bleak days of the Jamestown settlement. What better way to say "thanks" to God than to relish what He provided. It did them good and God was honored. It was the whole year of abundance in a meal. Similarly, we should eat with a full heart of appreciation for God's bountiful blessings.

But you can do more. Sometime, perhaps later at night with a cup of hot cider in your hands, you should deliberately take time as a family to turn your eyes to the Creator who "supplies you with all good things to enjoy." It is usually better not to have this extended time of thanks at the feast table. Cooks get nervous about that.

In some homes, sadly, God is not remembered. If you are in such a home, don't despair, but take some private time for reflecting and thanking God. God understands your dilemma.

Every Thanksgiving Day of my life, I've had the privilege of hearing the expressions of family and friends about the goodness of God. It usually brings tears. Regardless of the emotion, it is fitting to talk aloud about God's blessing. We need to multiply our thanksgiving to God.

Here are some ideas. Don't forget to prepare your family ahead of time.

  1. Ask each person to take a few moments with one other person to share his or her special reasons for being thankful this year. Then ask each person to express thanks to God for one or two items he or she just heard about in a time of prayer all together.

  2. Have all who will speak in some detail about one other family member who has meant something special to them in their life. Then, if your family is comfortable with it, have those who speak up thank God for what He has done through this person.

  3. Go through the alphabet remembering something to be especially thankful for beginning with each letter. You could go in order around the room. This is an idea the kids can enjoy also. Follow up with prayers of thanks by a few people asked ahead of time.

  4. Toss a foam ball around the room. Whoever catches it offers the next word of gratitude to God.

  5. Ask the oldest generation to tell stories from their history that cause them to be thankful. What happened providentially to bring about a certain benefit?

  6. Ask each person to select a short Bible passage that expresses what they want to say about God and His provision. Each person can then tell why this verse was chosen.

  7. Have the patriarch or the one most commonly known for his or her leadership in the family read a passage of Scripture and tell the group an incident in his or her life that he or she is most thankful for. Or have each of the older generation do this.

  8. Have the younger generation express what they see in the older generation that they are thankful for and would love to emulate.

  9. Or just pray together. Sometimes it is best to ask people to mention just one item at a time, allowing others their opportunity. Then they can chime back in with another item later, for however long you wish.

Well, you get the point. You can mix and match these ideas (or add better ones). The important thing is not the production, but the genuine thankfulness found in our hearts. Some families may have the ability to sing a song ("Great is Thy Faithfulness" or some familiar hymn or chorus; print the words ahead of time). You can figure this all out if you think and pray about it ahead of time. And when it is all finished, you will say, "We're stuffed not only with food but with so many blessings that we could not remember them all."

After it's all over someone will surely shout, "Did I hear someone say there's a little more pumpkin pie that needs to be eaten?"

Copyright © 2006 Jim Elliff. Permission granted for reproduction in exact form. All other uses require written permission.

www.CCWtoday.org

Monday, November 23, 2009

Home Alone: Do We Still Need the Local Church?

by Jim Elliff

The down-the-street local church is not the only show in town anymore. We are able to enjoy faith-building messages, listen to the latest Christian music, and explore the rich diversity and variety found in the most noted Christian gatherings, all with the click of the mouse or the touch of a button.

Many local church pastors now say, "The world is my parish," just as did the horseback-riding evangelist, John Wesley. But they mean this without ever going out of their own studio or auditorium! Some are communicating to millions.

It is not unusual for savvy web users to feed from many sources during a given week. Avid cable television viewers can watch the world's premium communicators any on almost any day! Some listen to Christian radio all day long. In fact, you can hear and see Christian leaders on your handheld media device while eating a hamburger in the local fast food restaurant.

For some time we have been losing the aura of significance once automatically assigned to the local church—the attention we had when nothing else much was going on.

We now have to face the truth—most media preachers are more engaging than those who speak in our own church, and we can watch them in our pajamas. Massive church meetings on television are so vivacious and musically stimulating that many simply lose their appetite for the "same ol' same ol'" of the regular assembly. And the church programs that once seemed so essential for spiritual vitality have become a bother to masses of declared believers, as illustrated by low levels of participation. Who really wants to be out one more night missing his favorite TV programming?

Do we really need the local church anymore?

This is not a meaningless question. Millions have written off church life as irrelevant. But some benefits are to be found in the local church that not even the best media experience can offer, such as . . .

  • Actual relationships rather than imaginary ones. Weak as some churches are, they are still made up of living people who come together. The media-engrossed Christian isolates himself from other believers while imagining relationships that are actually not there. This is not living life, but skipping life. I am often saddened by the isolated person who misses out on people. There is no true fellowship except among believers. Once you know it, you will not be satisfied without it.

  • Compassionate care rather than mere talk of concern. The media pastors talk about their love for their audience, but they will not be there when your child experiments with drugs, or your spouse dies, or your business goes down the drain. Those in the media audience will not sit at your bedside when you are dying. Radio preachers say they pray for you, but they really don't know you at all. Remember this: if you live alone, you die alone.

  • Real accountability rather than unchecked liberty. It may not seem immediately desirable, but accountability is a precious gift. In the local church, if you stray from God, someone is there to bring you back, or even to lovingly discipline you. If you are alone, you may stray deeper and deeper into sin even though you have periodic religious media fixes. Rather, you must subject yourself to the answerability that comes from engaging with real people. If you understand the deceitfulness of sin, you know you need that.

  • Authentic shared worship rather than vicarious viewing of worship. God promises benefits and blessings to corporate worship, even more so than for individual worship, though we should do both. Yet the isolated virtual Christian only imagines himself worshipping with others as he sits before the monitor. If the professing solo believer were to arrive in heaven one day, he would only then experience what he was made for when he became a believer. He will say, "How could I have missed it?"

Add to the above that the isolated media-only Christian disobeys God by not participating in the ordinance of the Lord's Supper or the corporate experience of Baptism, and that he refuses to use spiritual gifts and talents which God gave him expressly for edifying his local church, a distinct privilege and responsibility.

Do we still need the local church? Yes! But its members had better major on what makes it irreplaceable—becoming the loving, caring, worshipping, responsible fellowship it was meant to be. Your church, for instance, can be the most loving church in the world. Nothing can stop you except your own unwillingness. Love, especially in our media saturated day, is immensely attractive and satisfying.

Forget the flash and the showmanship. Don't even try to compete. Leave that to those media churches enamored with such surface concerns. They soon lose meaning to true believers anyway. Pare away all that is trifling—especially the traditions that have lost their meaning because they were only the last generation's attempts at being up-to-date. Do what is biblical even if it means changing everything. And then you will have meaning. You will be the local church that nobody can think little of anymore.

". . . not forsaking our own assembling together . . ." Hebrews 10:25

Copyright © 2008 Jim Elliff
Christian Communicators Worldwide, Inc.

Permission granted for not-for-sale reproduction in unedited form

including author's name, title, complete content, copyright and weblink.

Other uses require written permission.


www.CCWtoday.org

Friday, November 20, 2009

Special Offer

Two copies for just $8 until January 1, 2010. One to keep; one to give. Free shipping.

Many say this small book is their favorite work by Jim Elliff. Read reviews, get info and order here.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Honey, I Shrunk the Church: Traits of the Church Loss Movement

by Jim Elliff

Are you part of the church loss movement?

A church might lose members because its leaders are burdened with a new direction the people are unwilling to travel. Or, it might lose members because of natural calamities or factory closings. Perhaps the demographics of the community have changed, such as in rural areas where land that once used to be teeming with large families is now controlled by farming conglomerates. But often a church will lose members for less noble reasons.

Some people will tell you to just inaugurate a new evangelism plan to solve your problems. I do think evangelism is vital and have written about it extensively. However, in most cases, church health is more important in the beginning. People leave sick churches. The general rule is this: If you cannot invite people to the church because you just can’t imagine why anyone would really want to be there, church health is the first order of business.

While it is impossible to analyze all the reasons churches lose members, they are often characterized by the following traits. Some of these may describe your church. Let’s look at the negatives first, then consider how they might be overcome.

1. Leaders become increasingly administrative.

When pastors and other leaders no longer have spiritual goals, they fall into the abyss of endless administration. Administration is necessary, of course, but when running an orderly church becomes all that gets your attention, you are drifting toward an eccesiastical Bermuda Triangle. A leader constantly administrating, but rarely rallying people to godly action and heightened spirituality will lose the people he is attempting to lead. Leadership is also about inspiration.

2. People who become spiritually sick are left unwell.

Do the leaders really know the flock? Untended sheep get into trouble and become weaker by the day. Does your church expend any efforts to pastorally care for the sheep other than the typical public meetings? Sometimes the canker sores of a church have become so deeply infected that nobody is willing to deal with them. Spiritual sickness is the norm, and the church begins to feel like a cholera ward. But nobody is doing anything about it. On the inside the people cry out for spiritual care, but it is the care that will never come. When people sense they are not loved (that is, loved with action on the part of the leaders and the people as a whole), they often leave in order to find brotherly love in other places.

3. No new vision is projected and communication is reduced because there isn’t anything to communicate.

Leaders who are listening to the Lord have a vision to project to the people. They also are genuinely excited about what is happening. Some vision casting is carnal, admittedly, but it does not have to be that way. For instance, pastors may wish to see all their members reading the New Testament through in a given year, or seek to open up a new evangelistic ministry in a needy area of town. Life without vision is unprofitable, and you can hardly blame people for wanting to be in a church where their families will be challenged. Humans are born with ambition. Ambition can be wrongly placed or rightly placed. It is the job of leaders to inspire people to be ambitious for the good, and for the godly, goals. Don’t be surprised when people absent themselves from churches where there is no vision, even when the leaders are good men with right doctrine. People need to be challenged, and they will gravitate toward visionary churches even if their aspirations are not godly.

4. A maintenance mentality takes over.

Similar to the last comment, many churches believe that the highest calling for a church is to maintain the status quo. When budget time comes they say, “What did we do last year?” The phrase, “There is nothing new under the sun” was tailor made for such churches. If anything new is suggested, it dries up like spit on the hot tarmac.

Ralph Neighbor used to call this church’s battle cry the seven last words of the church: “We’ve never done it that way before.” The people and leaders have become so unanimated that nothing excites them anymore. Nothing new seems possible even if it comes straight from the pages of Scripture. Moses could not move such people to advance. But most of the time what they are maintaining is not worth saving. They are holding on to a few trinkets of the past that have little if anything to do with God’s intentions for the church. This is the prevailing mindset of the church loss movement.

In one of my first churches I removed the numbers board from the front of the auditorium. Some of you don’t know what that is, but I hope you will always remember that some of us fought the battle of the boards long before you were born! It was a symbol of the status quo. That’s the board that tells you how many members you have and how many people are attending Sunday School, how many brought their Bibles, plus a few other facts. It rests beside the choir loft usually on the right side, producing either pride or dismay. I removed it. One woman almost fainted in consternation. She was also the one who insisted that all of us fill out the “Eight point record system.” That’s about checking off if you attended, were on time, brought your Bible, completed a “study course,” and did other things. I didn’t fill one out, nor did most of the people. But she was so committed to it that she filled mine out for me every Sunday. Though I was the pastor and she didn’t give me 100% many Sundays! Status quo churches care about trivial things like this. Thankfully, other churches I’ve led were addicted to finding God’s best and doing it. Beware when all you do is maintain the same ol’ same ol’.

5. Pastors are focused on the disgruntled people.

In a diminishing church, people are often disgruntled, though they do not fully know why. Like the poor, disgruntled people will always be with us. But even in a good church there is no shortage of analysis going on. Husbands and wives are talking to each other on the way home from the church meeting saying, “I think the problem is . . . .” At first this may not be mean-spirited, but loving analysis can turn to critical bickering, and eventually disloyalty.

Upset people take lots of the leader’s time. Hours are spent in consideration of people’s words and behavior. Sometimes confrontation has to take place. And much time in prayer is also required. Not a few leaders waste additional time by worrying over these people. Some pastors spend all their time in this mode. There is hardly time to breathe, much less advance the cause of Christ through the church. The problem people use up all the leader’s worry capital.

Certainly pastors need to deal with difficult people, but a leader cannot be stymied from action and from projecting biblical vision for the church by a few blathering souls. They are not the only people in the church. The other people want to move on. But in a problem-centered church, the leadership never rises above dealing with the power brokers and complainers. Because of this, the people who are desirous of doing something more, the best people, will move on to greener pastures.

6. Bitterness is left uncorrected.

While it is true that disgruntled people can take all the energies of some pastors, wrongly so, it is also true that bitter, hurtful people are also often left untended in weakening churches. Feuds lasting scores of years might be evident to guests in a way that the congregation has grown accustomed to. I’ve seen this awful monster eat up all new growth of churches. Angry men or women, especially if they have retained some leadership, kill church health.

You usually hear bitter people first in the business meetings of the church, but next in the Sunday School class. In the class any gossip underpinned by bitterness may be passed along as long as you say, “bless her heart” or “I don’t mean to talk about him, but . . .” When one woman told me that to her the business meeting was the heart of church life, I knew I had one on my hands. One bitter man squared off with a brother of mine at the end of a church meeting, demanding that he go outside and fight. This was said in front of a brand new Christian college girl who had just been baptized! Another pastor tells of being punched out after one meeting in the front of the building! Now, that’s laying it all on the altar. Others don’t have such bravado, but they can kill people by their tongues. Bitterness is deadly to growing churches and needs to be confronted by leaders.

7. Attrition gradually takes several away, with no replacements. Some leave with a focus on peripheral issues (symptoms).

Attrition is normal, but most churches make up the differences. There are times when even good churches cannot overcome attrition if the reasons for it are outside of the church itself. In a spiritually sick church, people are leaving, but it seems that they leave for less than sound reasons.

Oh, I know there is a good kind of attrition. Though it breaks leaders’ hearts to lose people, some ungodly people walking out might do some good. But when good people leave and they cannot express why they are leaving, look deeply within yourselves to try to figure out why. Maybe God is showing you something important that could be changed. Sometimes the changes are about more than the leader. Deeper alterations need to take place, and that takes the entire church’s cooperation. The truth is, the church is just not meeting needs well though those leaving may never tell you what actually bothers them.

8. The church has become a small static group, with little vitality. People remember the “good ol’ days.”

That faithful knot of long term members remains, even in the worst of situations. Because we have buildings, dead churches will go on forever, even when the cause of Christ could be better served by closing the doors. This faithful group (who are sometimes to be commended for their sticking power) often look back to the “good ol’ days,” usually when they were young and in leadership. Often they project that the failures of the church are due to not doing the same programs that used to be done. “If we would just knock on doors on Tuesday nights like we used to, people would come.” “If we would have revival meetings, things would be different.” “If we would sing the good old hymns, people would not leave us.”

It is hard to move a group like this to action. I’m not saying that these people are necessarily ungodly, but they could use some of Caleb’s spirit. Instead, they are always looking back. Who wants to be part of a church of retro Christians?

9. The building slowly deteriorates for lack of interest.

Typically the sign in front of the church building says it all. It hasn’t been freshened up in years. Paint is chipping off the building. There is no longer any care taken for the grounds. The nursery smells of Hi Ho’s and old diaper pails, and looks like the 50s. The pastor’s office has a metal desk, some ancient wooden chairs, brown indoor/outdoor carpet, and a shelf with some old hymnals and a few study course books on it. The kitchen has a tiny “ice box” and some formica covered counters. The church people don’t notice anymore, but the guests do. The member’s inattention to their property says, “We don’t really care anymore.”

10. Pastors leave too soon having no sense of fulfillment in their work or hope of affecting any change.

If the church continues, it will do so with a variety of short-term pastors. While it can be good for student pastors to have a place to try their craft, there is no long-term commitment pastorally anymore, unless, of course, a settled older man retires in the community and is willing to offer help. While this scenario might come about for unavoidable reasons, it is characteristic of all shrinking churches. If the regime changes every year or two, pastors will hardly make an impact on the community, so as to engender growth. Newcomers say, “Something must be wrong because they change pastors every two years.”

What Can Be Done?

I feel for the pastors who have entered in to a church that is on the downward slide for any of the reasons mentioned above. You might have inherited more than any normal person can handle. But some leaders only continue the problem. What, if anything, can be done?

1. First, pray.

I don’t say this in jest; prayer is the way to unleash the God who specializes in the impossible. I once knew a praying church out in the country, ten miles down a lonely road to nowhere. If I remember correctly, the road was graveled. It grew and grew to several hundred people from its struggling original state. I might have said that the church had no hope. But I was wrong. Anything can happen.

2. Then, get with hospitality.

Loving people is always the right place to start to meet problems. If I were a pastor in a shrinking church, I would divide the congregation up alphabetically (A-E on Monday night, F-J on Tuesday night, etc.) and open up my home first thing to every person in the church. I don’t want anyone saying they had not been invited to my home. Within a couple of weeks, all the saints would have been inside my house. Next, I would plan on having some families over each week, one evening plus Sundays for lunch. Then I would ask God to give me some other hospitality people who will help out by inviting people over. I would have regular covered dish meals, every Sunday if possible. This would be an eating, fellowshipping kind of place. I know that can happen in any church with a little work.

One church I led became legendary for its hospitality. Many were converted through the witness of this church, and scores of people joined. But we didn’t have any plan of evangelism except loving people. Often guests would tell me that they had been invited to lunch two or three times the first time they visited. Any church can do this with a little work. It’s a wonderful goal. Love is the best witness to the world that Jesus can make a difference, and it melts the hearts of the skeptical. You might not be known for being great at anything else, but if your church can love, you will attract the best of people.

3. Leaders should disciple men.

Next, pastors should meet with men to study Scripture. This can take place in two ways: First, all the men may be invited to a weekly study. Second, men that the leaders desire to be with get special mentoring. Jesus chose “those He Himself wanted.” These mentored men may not be the leaders that are already in place. Pastors may wish to devote special mentoring time to young men, or quiet men, or new men, rather than the old guard. Don’t worry if people squalk. This is the right thing to do. You don’t have to announce it.

There are many reasons why I say to work with the men. Among them is this important idea: If all goes south, and people won’t follow a good leader, it is important for that leader to have the heart of most of the men. This will secure that he will be able to hang on and not be removed prematurely no matter how difficult times get.

4. Leaders should prioritize the needs of the church.

First, just list what it might take to become healthy. Maybe your list would include items like this: restore church discipline, secure a regenerate membership, improve the way the church worships, begin cell groups, chose a plurality of elders, make deacons servant “do-ers” instead of “deciders,” initiate true evangelism, establish a church covenant that is really used, and so on. Then prayerfully decide what is the first major issue you believe God wants you to face.

5. Do biblical study with the men of the church on the issue.

The men need to discover God’s will for the church for themselves as a group. Leaders should not pontificate on hard transitional issues, but carefully lead the men to discover what the Bible has to say. This creates ownership. Then, when it is time to make the move on that issue, these men will, more than likely, be behind you. Admittedly, there can be surprises. I recently heard of a cranky deacon who violently objected to the direction the pastor was leading by saying, “I’m tired of the word ‘biblical’.” He eventually ousted this good pastor. Now he doesn’t have to worry about being biblical anymore. Not much you can do about people like that. But it is generally so that if the men see it in Scripture, they will be able to provide the momentum in the right direction. This is how it should be. Take your time and be thorough in your study. Try your best to write out a statement of belief about the issue together. Get it worded just right. Work on the wording so that everyone has a part. You can use this to present the issue to the whole church.

6. Lead the church to commit to the new plan.

Each church has its own ways to make decisions. But if the men have come to consensus, then the rest should be easier. Communicate well. If necessary, meet in small groups with the church, discussing the issue that the men have already hashed out from the Bible. Then, when ready, make the decision. Even if you have elders, the decision should include the input of the people, that is, if you want ownership. That may or may not mean a formal vote, depending on your views.

7. Give some space, then move on to another need of the church in the same way.

God will guide you, and the men closest to you will provide counsel. God wants the church to be better even more than you do. So, leaders must patiently pay the price and move the church on down the line toward spiritual vitality and biblical conformity.

Finally

Well, there are details that could be added, but this is a general pattern that good leaders can work with.

At the end of this discussion, I want to say that not every church will grow, and some are going to be stubbornly unhealthy despite the best efforts of godly people. Some areas of the world are much harder than others. Some churches live under the shadow of larger, active churches that attract the whole town. Going might be tough. I feel for many pastors who struggle with past mistakes and current issues with very little help. But whining about it doesn’t accomplish much. At least you should die trying. The church ought to be better this year than last.

While I am sympathetic to the thought that we should be patient with changes in churches, changes that must happen for the church to become healthy, I want to caution about waiting too long to act. As soon as pastors have a substantial base of relationship with the men of the church, and a context of loving hospitality, they should begin to implement change. Again, God will have to lead you toward what should be done first.

The job of a pastor is not to make the church a haven for unconverted people who dominate the activity of the church for years to come. God is really not pleased with that. Some churches have been ruled by cantankerous leaders for so many years that they believe there is no hope for escape from their legal and deadening grasp. But the issues must be faced, or you run the danger of being more concerned about pleasing the ungodly than following the Lord. The righteous rejoice in a godly leader who does what is right, even if the ungodly bicker and bully. Leaders, don’t be afraid to move on to create the best church possible. Don’t do it in a cavalier way, but out of a huge heart of love and prayer. You must really love the people.

Then, if the powers that be are too strong for you, and remove you who are pastors and spiritually-minded members from your posts, you have at least sought to follow Christ with your whole heart. Remember that Jesus loved people more than you ever could, but they put Him on the cross. You may have done good for that church, for the kingdom, and for the remnant that may come out, in ways that you will not understand in this life.

________________

Our staff is always happy to talk with you if you have specific questions. We’re not experts on everything, but have at least done most things wrongly at one time or another. We know some things not to do. We’ve also experienced some measurable blessing in reaching people and growing healthy churches. Let us know if we can help.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Slick Card-itus: When Relevance Becomes Boring

by Jim Elliff

Am I just tired of relevance, or what? I received the umpteenth glossy card in the mail this week from yet another church opening a brand new “state-of-the-art” facility in our city. It claimed the usual: “Casual atmosphere, contemporary music, relevant messages and friendly people who genuinely care about each other.”

This shiny, oversized card explained the top ten reasons why people don’t go to church. It employed a strategy right out of the church growth handbooks that has become wearying to me. It is Church Growth 101, but such a strategy as never occurred to Paul or the Apostles.

Among the reasons for non-attendance were the following humorous statements:

· Can’t find a polyester leisure suit anywhere;
· relate to jazz and rock more than Handel and Bach;
· would rather sleep in own bed than in a pew;
· one word: hypocrites!;
· already served time as a child;
· I gave at the office;
· during organ music, start craving ballpark hot dogs;
· can only remember three commandments;
· feel guilty enough already.

It’s pretty funny actually, but also revealing. Let’s go through the list examining not just what is being said, but what is implied. In the end, this church is excluding people in ways they perhaps don’t realize, which is not an irrelevant issue as far as God is concerned.

1. Can’t find a polyester leisure suit anywhere. Right off this church seems too narrow for me. I prefer a church that tries to make the poor man, the old man who hasn’t bought new clothes in years, and the retro dresser feel more at home—a church more interested in hearts than clothes.

2. Relate to jazz and rock more than Handel and Bach. Again, way too narrow. What about the music lover who has a heart for God whose tastes in music are broad? Seems rather exclusive to make things uninviting for anyone who would love Bach, the greatest believing composer of all time. And, of course they would not want the country music lover or the foreigner who just can’t get into our western rock. Never.

3. Would rather sleep in own bed than in pew. Anything wrong with sleeping in your own bed and staying awake in the pew? I assume they mean that churches a person might choose, even those that include true believers, must be dull in comparison to their church. Now that really helps the advancement of the kingdom of God, doesn’t it?

4. One word: hypocrites! What is this supposed to imply? Is it this church’s way of saying that all other churches but their own are filled with hypocrites? Come on! I thought they welcomed sinners.

5. Already served time as a child. Some of us feel that being in church as a child was a positive thing, shaping our lives, giving us a context for spiritual growth, and preparing us for a Christian future. And should my kids think of church as “doing time?”

6. Already gave at the office. This statement means, of course, that these people aren’t interested in money at all. But I don’t believe it. In other words, for them, money is not necessary to buy the latest media equipment and state-of-the-art buildings they require. Those things just float in from the sky. It also implies that every church but theirs is obsessing about money. It is simply not true.

7. During organ music, start craving ball park hotdogs. So? You should eat before you come.

8. Can only remember three commandments. Now there’s a great qualification for a church member—ignorance. I know that a church meeting can gather people who don’t know anything at all, but this is no virtue. Will they kick them out once they learn something? This is like saying, “No mature Christians wanted.” It’s also screaming this message: “Come here and you won’t learn a thing.”

9. Feel guilty enough already. God uses guilt to show us our need of Christ. Without it, you are left in your self-dependence. A person without Christ should not feel good, but should feel sad about his or her sins. Christians need the same when disobeying God. Shouldn’t a church cooperate with the Spirit whose job it is to bring true conviction of sin? Read 1 Corinthians 14:24-25.

I know what this church is intending to say. But when you add it up, their message does not promote the growth of the kingdom of God as a whole. It demeans even good people and good churches made up of true believers who don’t measure up to their idea of what church life should be. And it designs to create distaste for even true churches if they differ from their style. It is arrogant. It may be about that church’s growth, but it isn’t about kingdom growth. They project an “openness” that is really very narrow; a relevance that is not relevant at all; and a concern that is grossly self-serving.

Put all together, a church that includes people who dress out-of-style because they don’t care about the latest fashions, who may relate to classical music more than rock, are alert during the church meetings, try hard not to be hypocritical, enjoyed going to church as children, are generous and ready to give their money for God’s causes, eat prior to coming to the gathering, know and love God’s commandments, and are convicted by messages that speak to them about their sin is not a church these church growth experts would like to be part of.

Well, to each his own. Our church will take their throw-offs readily, provided they are intent on following Christ.

My message to this relevant church: Grow up and “put on a heart of compassion” (Col. 3:12).

Monday, November 9, 2009

Elders' Meetings that Do Something

by Jim Elliff

Elders’ meetings should not be an exercise in futility. Rather, to be effective for the church and interesting for the elders, some thought must be put into your time together.

Some suggestions:

1. Plan for meeting together more often and for a longer period of time.

We find meeting for at least four hours weekly is about right, 6-10 pm. Even then we find that we want more time. In fact, before one of our elders changed jobs, we would meet from 5-10 pm. The “once-a-month elders’ meeting” is the kiss of death for most elder teams. It usually means that the elders do not understand their responsibilities and are mere figure heads. Don’t die from pastoral atrophy.

We like to make our meetings enjoyable. We start out by eating an inexpensive meal together, for instance. We might do this in a restaurant or at one of our homes by bringing in pizza. Sometimes we include our wives, so that they can enjoy visiting with each other while we meet. Occasionally, the entire family of each elder joins us. The elders then pull aside in a separate place for their meeting. The meal cost is on the church in order to provide us extra time to be together. It’s a reasonable perk for hard working elders.

If a man cannot make this time commitment (and there is more ministry time needed besides this) then he should not be an elder. There are many good men who do not have the time to serve as an elder. You are not really pastoring people if you don’t do the work.

2. Challenge each other spiritually.

Again, if you only meet a short time, you will miss this important element. We sometimes ponder six characteristics of leadership: Character, knowledge, skills, affection, faith and enthusiasm. Give an honest report of your lives. Challenge each other with insights from Scripture and experience. Be honest. Repent in each other’s presence. Be direct with each other. Good men will love it. Petty men cannot stand it. But petty men are not to be elders.

3. Discuss the state of the flock.

I know that every church is not set up the same, but most healthy churches share actual pastoral oversight responsibilities among the elders. This usually takes means that a segment of the church is under each elder’s direct care, such as might be accomplished through home cell groups of some kind. For us, we divide the entire church into several “congregations” each led by a pastor. The congregations have between 15 and 35 people, depending on how new the group is. If you do not have such a breakdown of the church, it is nearly impossible to actually shepherd the people.

We find that taking some time to talk about issues among the congregations is our pastoral responsibility. We share our insights about how to handle certain problems that come up, or how to stimulate those under our individual “charge.” This takes quite a bit of our time together (usually 45 minutes to an hour), but it is well worth it.

4. Have an agenda.

Not everyone is organized. One of our elders is better at this than the rest of us. He enjoys putting together the agenda of items to work through each week. Find out who does this the best and let him lead you. Other elders can shoot agenda items to him by email or phone call so that he is fully prepared. This does not mean that all discussion is led by this elder, but only that he moves you through the evening. Forget Robert’s Rules of Order, which is great for running the legislature but lousy for running churches and elders’ meetings. The church is a family, not a nation. It is helpful for the group to make assignments with end dates for the agenda keeper to highlight to the group. Having an agenda makes sense, but don’t let the group slide into acting just like a management team at your work.

5. Actually pray for individuals and issues being faced.

The elders must be pray-ers. This is a portion of your time together that is so important it cannot be overlooked. It is not tacked on to the end of a meeting, but a major reason you are coming together. We find praying about “one item at a time” is best, with the freedom to pray as often as we wish. Sometimes we ask each elder to pray about members of his own group particularly. If necessary, we can walk and pray, or do something else to give us focus and keep us energetic.

If all the rest of the church prayed like the elders pray, how effective would your church be?

6. Study together toward a unified position on difficult issues.

This is the most often missed facet of elders working together. It is the responsibility of every elder to be “holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict” (Titus 1:9).

We’ve used this time for much profitable discussion concerning vital biblical issues. Our longest study actually lasted two years, more time than most will want to spend on an issue. But this study has turned into a book that we hope will be of great use to the churches. Usually a study on a particular subject will take months, however.

Start with reading over the biblical material on the subject of interest. For instance, you may wish to come to a conclusion about who should take the Lord’s Supper, or what the Bible has to say about the prerequisites for joining a church, or about women’s roles in the church, or about divorce and remarriage, or who is allowed to be an elder, or what the real responsibilities of a deacon should be. Once you have an issue that is of pastoral importance, try to find every biblical reference to it. Go through that material first as carefully as possible, painfully working through each word and phrase. Decide on a “scribe” who can take notes carefully.

Next, you may wish to read a couple of books on the subject, perhaps on various sides of the issue. There may be one or two elders who read even more broadly on behalf of the group.

Attempt to craft a position statement on the subject. It might be short or long. You should labor over the wording until you are all in perfect agreement, reading and rereading it. This is not wasted time. It serves to get the position deep into each elder.

Following this, take the men of the church through a biblical study of the subject. Read slowly and carefully through your position, looking up the passages and talking about every aspect. Listen to their input and reshape the document as needed. If it won’t fly among the men, it won’t fly in the church as a whole. If it is received on this level, it will likely be enthusiastically received by the church.

Finally, present the document to the church as a whole. Or, if it is a matter pertaining only to the elders, keep your findings in your own notebook of positions about various issues of leadership and oversight. When appropriate, post these position statements on your website. This will help incoming members and guests to understand better what is expected and what the beliefs and actions of the church are. It will also demonstrate that the church is interested in being biblical above being pragmatic.

Usually an hour and a half of our meeting is devoted to such study, or more if possible. One of our men is particularly good at shaping what we talk about into a draft to discuss and perfect.

You will find that elders will own these studied positions and will be able to carefully lead others with conviction and biblical insight.

7. Make these meetings non-optional.

Every elder must make meeting together a priority. Some men who travel might not find it possible to be in town for such meetings on a regular basis. Consider changing your travel schedule or stepping down from leadership. The meetings are too important to miss. It is disappointing to the whole team for one member to fail to be there. It often means that critical issues will be misunderstood.

There is much more to do as elders than meet together. But it is nearly impossible to do the work you are called upon to do without meeting. It would be akin to asking a man and woman to parent a family when they never talk about what is needed or expected. It simply cannot be done correctly without prolonged and intimate discussion.

Copyright © 2008 Jim Elliff
Christian Communicators Worldwide, Inc.
Permission granted for not-for-sale reproduction in unedited form
including author's name, title, complete content, copyright and weblink.
Other uses require written permission.

www.CCWtoday.org

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

The Godliest Parents

by Jim Elliff & Steve Burchett

Are you the godliest person your child has ever known?

Too often, parents relegate the role of being a spiritual leader for the family to a youth pastor or a children's ministry worker, but biblically this should not be the norm. Deuteronomy 6 speaks of the parental responsibility to teach the Word of God "when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up" (v. 7).

In Ephesians 6:4 Paul instructed home-grown leadership when he said, "Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord." Children need godly parents much more than they need a spectacular children's or youth ministry.1 The evangelization and discipleship of your child is your responsibility, and a main channel for conveying the gospel is the life you live before them.

Do you remember Timothy's mother and grandmother? The apostle Paul wrote about Timothy's "sincere faith . . . which first dwelt in your grandmother Lois and your mother Eunice" (2 Timothy 1:5). Later, in 2 Timothy 3:14, Paul stated, "You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them" (emphasis added). Surely even more than Paul's example over a brief period (cf. 1 Timothy 1:2; 2 Timothy 1:2; 3:10-11), it was Lois and Eunice that authenticated the message they proclaimed before young Timothy. They "practiced what they preached," and this gave their words a genuineness that Timothy could not deny.

Here's what we should learn: If we want our children to hear the gospel from us, they must see the gospel's impact upon us. How we live before them powerfully preaches the gospel and its implications for our lives.

How does this work out? If we tell our children that the proper response to the gospel is one of faith, then they should see us resting in the promises of God. Do they see you trusting God even when trials come? If you tell your child that following Christ is costly, is it costing you anything? We should tell our children that repentance is necessary for anyone who wants to be a Christian, but are we repentant about anything? The Lord might use our godly behavior to have a saving effect upon our children.

Also, we have the high privilege of modeling the character and perspective of God before our children. For example:

  • We model God's view of sin by our approval or disapproval of what we watch or listen to. What do your children see you watching and enjoying on the television? Are your favorite shows consistent with God's character? And when that improper advertisement comes on television, have you ever noticed what happens? All eyes turn to dad or mom. Why?
  • We model God's judgment of sin by our consistent discipline of sin in the lives of our children. We give children a taste of the judgment they would face apart from Christ when we obey God's Word and discipline them appropriately (cf. Proverbs 13:24; 22:15; 23:13-14; 29:15; Ephesians 6:4; Colossians 3:21).
  • We model God's love for His own by our care for our children. Do you serve your children? Do your children see you giving up your "free time" in order to help them with a project or listen to a story about their trip to the museum? To give and serve like this is to imitate God "who did not spare His own Son" (Romans 8:32) and Jesus who "did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many" (Mark 10:45).
  • We model God's view of what really matters in life with how we prioritize our family's schedule. Sports have become a key competitor to the life of a church. Perhaps you find yourself at ball practice, instead of that important church meeting. Remember Jesus' words in Matthew 6:24, "No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other." The remedy is not to renounce sports, but to reprioritize your family's schedule so that your children will not look back upon their childhood and have to honestly say, "My parents served my sports schedule."
There is a direct connection between the way we live and our children's understanding of God and the gospel. Furthermore, we greatly impact the believability of the gospel when we affirm or deny it with our behavior.

_________________________

1There will be children in our churches who come from unbelieving families, and in these situations people in the church should be willing to stand in the gap that has been left by negligent parents.

Copyright © 2007 Jim Elliff & Steve Burchett. Permission granted for reproduction in exact form, including web address. All other uses require written permission.

www.CCWtoday.org